ارزیابی مقاومت ژنوتیپ‌های سویا در مقابل نماتد سیستی سویا Heterodera glycines

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشکده زراعی، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری، ساری، ایران.

2 پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.

3 پژوهشکده ژنتیک و زیست فناوری کشاورزی طبرستان، دانشگاه علوم کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی ساری. ساری، ایران.

چکیده

چکیده
نماتد سیستی سویا Heterodera glycines ، مهم‌ترین عامل کاهش محصول سویا Glycine max  در اکثر مناطق زیر کشت آن در دنیا بوده و در ایران نیز در استان مازندران و گلستان گسترش دارد. در تحقیق حاضر واکنش تعداد 100 ژنوتیپ‌ و رقم سویا موجود در بانک بذر مرکز تحقیقات کاربردی شرکت توسعه کشت دانه‌های روغنی نسبت به نماتد سیستی سویا مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. ژنوتیپ‌ها در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار در شرایط دمای ثابت گلخانه بررسی شدند. نژاد جمعیت مورد بررسی نماتد سیستی سویا نیز با استفاده از ارقام افتراقی سویا تعیین و شناسایی شد. نتایج نشان داد که 12 ژنوتیپ‌ از جمله Leflor، Bedford وForrest به‌عنوان مقاوم، سه ژنوتیپ‌ Chiquita،Centennial  و Cloud به‌عنوان نسبتاً مقاوم، 26 ژنوتیپ‌ به‌عنوان نسبتاً حساس و 59 ژنوتیپ‌ نیز از جمله Essex، Faur،Clark  و رقم جی کا (Jk) به‌عنوان ژنوتیپ کاملا حساس نسبت به نژاد شماره سه نماتد سیستی سویا شناسایی شدند. نتایج تجزیه کلاستر ژنوتیپ‌ها را براساس صفات مقاومت به نماتد، دوره رسیدگی سویا، رنگ بذر و رنگ ناف به پنج گروه تقسیم کرد. بیشترین ژنوتیپ‌های حساس در گروه دوم و بیشترین ژنوتیپ‌های مقاوم در گروه سوم کلاستر قرار گرفتند. همچنین اکثر ژنوتیپ‌های مقاوم شناسایی شده از نظر دوره رسیدگی سویا در گروه‌های V و VI دوره رسیدگی قرار داشتند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Evaluation of soybean genotypes for resistance against soybean cyst nematode Heterodera glycines

نویسندگان [English]

  • Abolfazl Keipoor 1
  • Hamid Najafi zarini 1
  • Ramin Heydari 2
  • Ali Pakdin 3
  • Gholam Ali Ranjbar 1
1 Faculty of Plant Breeding, Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, sari, Iran.
2 Department of Plant Protection, Agricultural Campus, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
3 Tabarestan Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, sari, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract 
Soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) is the most important factor in reducing the yield of soybean crop (Glycine max) in most of its cultivated areas in the world and is also spread in Iran in Mazandaran and Golestan provinces. In the present study, the reaction of 100 genotypes and soybean cultivars in the seed bank of Oilseeds Research and Development Company to soybean cyst nematode was evaluated. Genotypes were studied in a randomized complete block design with three replications under constant greenhouse temperature conditions. The race of soybean cyst nematode population was determined and identified using differential soybean cultivars. The results showed that 12 genotypes among Leflor, Bedford and Forrest as resistant ; three genotypes including Chiquita, Centennial and Cloud as moderately resistant ; 26 genotypes as moderately sensitive and 59 genotypes namely Essex, Faur and Clark In addition susceptible check (Jk cultivar) as highly sensitive genotype to race 3 of soybean cyst nematode were identified. The results of cluster analysis based on nematode resistance, maturity group, seed color and umbilical color divided the genotypes into five groups. The most susceptible genotypes were in the second cluster group and the most resistant genotypes were in the third cluster group. Also, most of the resistant genotypes in terms of soybean maturity group belonged to groups V and VI of the maturity group.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: Differential cultivars
  • Heterodera glycines
  • Maturity group
  • Susceptibility
  • Race

مراجع

References
Acharya K, 2016. Distribution and Characterization of the Soybean Cyst Nematode, H. glycines (HG) Types in South Dakota. Theses and Dissertations. 967 pp.
Asadi M, Sadeghnezhad H, 2020. Investigation of Soybean Irrigation Water Productivity and Yield in Different Systems of Tillage and Crop Residues. Agricultural Mechanization and Systems Research 21 (74): 83–96.
Bernard RL, Creineens CR, Cooper RL, Collins FI, Krober OA, et al. 1995. Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Maturity Groups 000-IV (PC 01.547-PI 266.807). U.S. Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No 1844. 178 pp.
Cook R, Noel GR, 2002. Cyst Nematodes: Globodera and Heterodera Species. In Starr J, Cook R, Bridge J, (eds) CAB Plant Resistance to Parasitic Nematodes. International Publishing, Wallingford, UK. 71–105.
De Grisse AT, 1969. Redescription ou modification de quelques techniques utilisees dans l’etude des nematodes phyto-parasitaires. Mededlingen van de Rijks fakulteit Landbowwetenschappen Gent 34: 351–369.
Dehghanzadeh S, Tanha Maafi Z, Rahnama K, Zaman Mirabadi A, Heydari R, 2016. Evaluation of some soybean lines to soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) under control conditions and field. Iranian Journal of Plant Protection Science 47 (1): 1–10.
Dong K, Barker KR, Opperman CH, 1997. Genetics of Soybean-H. glycines Interactions. Journal of Nematology 29 (4): 509–522.
Dunn RA, 1969. Extraction of cysts of Heterodera species from soils by centrifugation in high density solutions. Journal of Nematology 1: 7
Ghafari S, Tanha Maafi Z, Heydari R, Eskandari A, 2012. Investigating the interaction of Heterodera glycines soybean nematode and Bradyrhizobium japonicum on a soybean sensitive and resistant cultivar. Pests and Plant Pathology 80 (1): 39–33. (In Persian).
Golden AM, Epps JM, Riggs, RD, Duclos, LA, Fox, JA, et al., 1970. Terminology and identity of intraspecific forms of the soybean cyst nematode (H. glycines). Plant Disease 54: 544–546.
Han Y, Zhao X, Cao G, Wang Y, Li Y, et al., 2015. Genetic characteristics of soybean resistance to HG type 0 and HG type 1.2.3.5.7 of the cyst nematode analyzed by genome-wide association mapping. BMC Genomics 16 (1): 598–610.
Heydari R, Pourjam E, Tanha Maafi Z, Safaie N, 2008. Determining the degree of hostility of some soybean cultivars to the dominant type of cyst nematode in Iran. H. glycines HG Type 0. Plant Pathology 44: 319–329.
Heydari R, Pourjam E, Tanha Maafi Z, Safaie N, 2010. Comparative host suitability of common bean cultivars to the soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines, in Iran. Nematology 12(3): 335–341.
Hussey RS, Boerma HR, Raymer PL, Luzzi BM, 1991. Resistance in soybean cultivars from maturity groups V-VIII to soybean cyst and root-knot nematodes. Supplement to the Journal of Nematology 23: 576–583.
Jiao Y, Vuong T, Liu Y, Meinhardt C, Liu Y, et al. 2015. Identification and evaluation of quantitative trait loci underlying resistance to multiple H.G types of soybean cyst nematode in soybean PI 437655. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128 (1): 15–23.
Kumundini S, 2010. Soybean growth and development. in: Singh G, (eds). The soybean: botany, production and uses. CAB International, Oxfordshire, UK. 48–73.
Latifi N, 1993. Soybean agriculture (cultivation-Physiology-usages). Jahad daneshgahi Mashhad .pub. 282pp. (In Persian)
MacGuidwin AE, Grau CR, Oplinger ES, 1995. Impact of planting ‘Bell,’ a soybean cultivar resistant to H. glycines in Wisconsin. Journal of Nematology 27: 78–85.
Nelson RL, Amdor PJ, Orf JH, 1987. Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Maturity Groups 000 to IV (PI 273.483 to PI 427.107). U.S.Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No 1718. 267 pp.
Nelson RL, Amdor PJ, Orf JH, Cavins JF, 1988. Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection: Maturity Groups 000 to IV (PI 427.136 to PI 445.845). U.S.Department of Agriculture Technical Bulletin No 1726. 188 pp.
Niblack TL, Arelli PR, Noel GR, Opperman CH, Orf  JH, et al., 2002. A revised classification scheme for genetically diverse populations of H. glycines. Journal of Nematology 34: 279–288
Niblack TL, Wrather JA, Heinz RD, Donald PA, 2003. Distribution and virulence phenotypes of H. glycines in Missouri. Plant Disease 87: 929–932.
Niblack TL, Baker NK, Norton DC, 1992. Soybean yield losses due to H. glycines in Iowa. Plant Disease 76: 943–948.
Niblack TL, Colgrove KB, Colgrove AC, 2006. Soybean cyst nematode in Illinois from 1990: Shift in virulence phenotype of field populations. Journal of Nematology 38: 285.
Noel GR, Edwards DI, 1996. Population development of H. glycines and soybean yield in soybean-maize rotations following introduction into a noninfested field. Journal of Nematology 28: 335–342.
Noel GR, 1992. History, distribution, and economics. In: Riggs RD, Wrather JA (eds). Biology and management of the soybean cyst nematode. St. Paul, MN, APS Press. 1–13.
Peregrine EK, Sprau GL, Cremeens CR, Nelson RL, Orf JH et al. 2008. Evaluation of the USDA Soybean Germplasm Collection Maturity Groups 000-IV (PI 578371-PI 612761) U.S. Department of Agriculture, Technical Bulletin No 1919: 155 pp.
Riggs RD, Schmitt DP, 1991. Optimization of the H. glycines race test procedure. Journal of Nematology 23: 149–154.
Riggs RD, Rakes L, Dombek D, 1995. Responses of soybean rhizocultivars and breeding lines to races of H. glycines.  Journal of Nematology 27: 592–601.
Riggs RD, Schmitt DP, 1988. Complete characterization of the race scheme for H. glycines. Journal of Nematology 20: 392–395.
Riggs RD, Rakes L, Elkins R, 1991. Soybean cultivars resistant and susceptible to H. Glycines. Journal of Nematology 23: 584–592.
Riggs RD, Hamblen ML, Rakes L, 1988. Resistance in commercial soybean cultivars to six races of H. glycines and to Meloidogyne incognita. Supplement to the Journal of Nematology 2: 70–76.
Robbins RT, Rakes L, Elkins CR, 1994. Reproduction of the Reniform Nematode on Thirty Soybean Cultivars. Supplement to Journal of Nematology 26 (4S): 659–664.
Schmitt DP, Shannon G, 1992. Differentiating soybean responses to H. glycines races. Crop Science 32: 275–277.
Scott WO, Aldrich SR, 1983. Modern Soybean Production. 2th edition, S & A Publication, Champaign, Illinois. 209 pp.
Sugano M, 2006. Nutritional implications of soy. In: Sugano M, (eds) Soy in health and disease prevention. CRC Press, Boca Raton. 1–16.Smith JR, Young LD, 2003. Host Suitability of Diverse Lines of Phaseolus vulgaris to Multiple Populations of H. glycines. Journal of Nematology 35: 23–28.
Sikora EJ, Noel GR, 1991. Distribution of H. glycines races in Illinois. Journal of Nematology 23 (4S): 624.
Tanha Maafi Z, Geraert E, Kheiri A, Sturhan D, 1999. Occurrence of soybean cyst nematode H. glycines Ichinohe, 1952 in Iran. Iranian Journal of Plant Pathology 35: (1/4).
Tanha Maafi Z, Salati M, Riggs RD, 2008. Distribution, population density, race and type determination of soybean cyst nematode, Heterodera glycines, in Iran. Nematology 10: 919–924.
Tanha Maafi Z, Heydari R, 2015. Review on Incidence of Soybean Cyst Nematode in Iran. Yasouj Plant Pathology Sci 4 (2): 1–16.
Tylka GL, Gebhart GD, Marett CC, 2002. Evaluation of soybean varieties resistant to soybean cyst nematode in Iowa. Ames, IA: Iowa State University IPM Bulletin 52.
Wang J, Niblack TL, Tremain JA, Wiebold WJ, Tylka, GL, et al. 2003. Soybean cyst nematode reduces soybean yield without causing obvious aboveground symptoms. Plant Disease 87(6): 623–628.
Wrather JA, Anderson TR, Arsyad DM, Tan Y, Ploper LD, et al. 2001. Soybean disease loss estimates for the top ten soybean-producing countries in 1998. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 23: 115–121.
Wrather JA, Anderson TR, Arsyad DM, Gai J, Ploper LD, et al. 1997. Soybean disease loss estimates for the top 10 soybean-producing countries in 1994. Plant Disease 81: 107–110.
Wrather JA, Koenning SR, 2006. Estimates of disease effects on soybean yields in the United States 2003 to 2005. Journal of Nematology 38: 173–180.
Wrather JA, Koenning SR, 2009. Effects of diseases on soybean yields in the United States 1996 to 2007. Online. Plant Health Progress.
Young LD, 1996. Yield loss in soybean caused by H. glycines. Journal of Nematology 28: 604–607.
 
پژوهش های کاربردی در گیاهپزشکی
دوره 11، شماره 3
مهر 1401
صفحه 65-75

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 17 آبان 1400
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 17 آبان 1400

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار