اثر چهار ترکیب حشره کش روی مراحل نابالغ (Westwood)(Hymenoptera:Trichogrammatidae) Trichogramma evanescens پارازیتوئید تخم مینوز گوجه فرنگی Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lep.: Gelechiidae)

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 بخش تحقیقات گیاهپزشکی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان مرکزی، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اراک، ایران.

2 دانشیار گروه گیاهپزشکی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.

3 استاد، گروه گیاهپزشکی، پردیس کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی دانشگاه تهران، کرج، ایران.

چکیده

چکیده
     اثرات دوز توصیه ­شده­ی مزرعه‌ای و نصف دوز توصیه ­شده‌ی مزرعه­ای چهار حشره کش آبامکتین، امامکتین­بنزوات، استامی پرید و فلوبندیامید روی مراحل نابالغ زنبورTrichogramma evanescens (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae) پارازیتویید مینوز گوجه­فرنگیTuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lep.: Gelechiidae)  مطالعه شد. تخم­های پارازیته­ شده بید غلات Sitotroga cerealella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) در مراحل لاروی، پیش­شفیرگی و شفیرگی پارازیتویید به روش غوطه­وری تیمار شدند. کارت­های حاوی 140 عدد تخم پارازیته شده­ی بید غلات به مدت 10 ثانیه در محلول­های حشره­کش­ها که با غلظت توصیه شده­ی مزرعه­ای و نصف آن تهیه شده بودند، غوطه­ور شدند. زیست سنجی فقط برای مراحل نابالغ نسل F0 انجام شد.  میزان ظهور، پارازیتیسم و طول عمر در نسلF0  و نیز کاهش در میزان ظهور و نسبت جنسی در نسل F1  در تیمارهای مختلف تعیین شد. استامی پرید در مرحله­ی شفیرگی در گروه بی­زیان قرار گرفت. در میزان ظهور نسل F1 آبامکتین، امامکتین و استامی پرید کم زیان وفلوبندیامید بی­زیان دسته بندی شد. از نظر نسبت جنسی فلوبندیامید تنها حشره­کشی بود که با شاهد اختلاف معنی­داری نداشت. درمورد میزان پارازیتیسم و ظهور در نسلF0  آبامکتین و امامکتین بنزوات در همه­ی مراحل رشدی و دو غلظت به کار­رفته در گروه کم­زیان دسته بندی شدند. فلوبندیامید در همه­ی مراحل و هر دو غلظت در گروه بی­زیان گروه­بندی شد. به طور کلی آبامکتین و فلوبندیامید در هر دو نسل به ترتیب در گروه کم زیان و بی زیان قرار گرفتند.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Effects of Four Insecicides on Immature Stages of Trichogramma evanescens Westwood (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) Egg Parasitoid of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lep.: Gelechiidae)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sedigheh Ashtari 1
  • Ghodratallah Sabhi 2
  • Khalil Talebi Jahromi 3
1 1Plant Protection Research Department, Markazi Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization, AREEO, Arak, Iran.
2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
3 Professor, Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Abstract
The effects of the recommended dose (RD) and half of recommended dose (HRD) of four insecticides, abamectin, emamectin benzoate, acetamiprid and flubendiamide, were studied on different immature stages of Trichogramma evanescens, egg parasitoids of tomato leaf miner Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae). Parasitized eggs of the Angoumois grain moth, Sitotroga cereallela (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae), were treated by the dipping method at the larval, prepupal, or pupal stages of the parasitoid. Cards containing 140 parasitized eggs of Sitotroga cerealella (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) were dipped into RD and HRD solutions of the insecticides for 10 seconds at each developmental stage of the parasitoid. Bioassay was performed only for immature stages of F0 generation. Reduction in emergence rate, parasitism rate and longevity of F0 generation as well as reduction in emergence rate and sex ratio of F1 generation were determined. Acetamiprid and flubendiamide were harmless at pupal stage, abamectin, emamectin benzoate and acetamiprid were slightly harmful but flubendiamide was harmless in regards of the emergence rate of the generation F1. Flubendiamide was the only insecticide with no significant difference on sex ratio compared to control. Both concentrations of abamectin and emamectin benzoate were slightly harmful and flubendiamide was harmless in terms of the rate of emergence and parasitism at the generation F0 in all developmental stages. In general, abamactin and flubendiamide in both generations were in slightly harmful and harmless groups, respectively.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keyword: Non lethal effects
  • Parasitism
  • Longevity
  • Sex ratio

مراجع

Abbott, WS, 1925. A method for computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. Journal of Economic Entomology, 18, 265-267.  
Ashtari, S, Sabahi Q and Talebi jahromi KH, 2018. Evaluation of toxicity of some biocompatible insecticides on Trichogramma brassicae and T. evanescens under laboratory and semi-field conditions. Journal of Crop Protection, 7 (4): 459-469.
Bartlett BR, 1964. Integration of Chemical and Biological Control. In: DeBach P. (ed.) Biological Control of Insect Pests and Weeds. Chapman and Hall, New York, NY; p489-511.
Barrientos, ZR, Apablaza HJ, Norero SA, Estay PP, 1998. Threshold temperature and thermal constant for development of the South American tomato moth, Tuta absoluta (Lepidoptera, Gelechiidae). Cienc Investig Agrar. 25:133–7.
Carvalho GA, Rezende DT, Moura AP, Moscardini VF, Lasmar O and Souza JR, 2005. Selectivity of flubendiamide, a new insecticide used to control tomato pests in Brazil to Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hym., Trichogrammatidae). Egg Parasit. News, IOBC. 17.
Carvalho, GA, Reis PR,  Rocha LCD,  Moraes JC,  Fuini LC and Ecole CC,  2003. Side-effects of insecticides used in tomato fields on Trichogramma  pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Acta Sci. 25: 275–279.
Costa MA, Muscardini VF, Gontijo PDC, Carvalho GA, Oliveira RLD and Oliveira HND, 2014. Sub lethal and transgenerational effects of insecticides in developing Trichogramma galloi.Ecotoxicology, Springer.
Croft BA, 1990. Arthropod Biological Control Agents and Pesticides. John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
Das, SK., Mukherjee, I., Roy, A. 2017. Flubendiamide as New Generation Insecticide in Plant Toxicology: A Policy Paper. Advances in Clinical Toxicology.  2:100-122.
Desneux N, Decourtype A, Delpuech JM,  2007. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology,52: 81-106.
Fisher,M, Mrozik H, 1989. Chemistry. In: champbell, W.C.(ed). Ivermectin and abamectin. Springer, NY, USA.p.1-23. Ghazzagh, M. 2016. Effects of two insecticides proclimfit and flubendiamid on biological parameters of Trichogramma brassicae in laboratory conditions, Msc thesis, agricultural entomology, Gorgan University, 89 pp.
Ghazzagh M, 2016. Effects of two insecticides of proclimfit and flubendiamide on biological parameter of Trichogramma brassicae in laboratory conditions, Thesis MSc, University of Gorgan, 89 pp.
Hassan SA, 1998. The initiative of The IOBC/WPRS working group on pesticides and beneficial organisms In: Ecotoxicology, Pesticisdes and beneficial organisms.(Eds: Haskell, P.T. and McEwen,P.) Kluwer Academic Publishing, pp22-56.
Hussain D, Ali A, Mushtaq-Ul-Hassan, M, Ali S, Saleem, M and Nadeem S, 2012. Evaluationof toxicity of some new insecticides against egg parasitoid Trichogramma chilonis (Ishii) (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammitidae). Pakistan Journal Zoology, 44: 1123-1127.
Hewa-Kapuge S, Dougall SM, and Hoffmann A, 2003. Effects ofmethoxyfenozide, indoxacarb, and other insecticides on the beneficial egg parasitoid Trichogramma brassicae (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) under laboratory and field conditions. Journal of Economic Entomology, 96(4): 1083-1090
Khan MA and Ruberson JR, 2017. Lethal effects of selected novel pesticides on immature stages of Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae). Pest Management Science,73: 2465-2472.
Knutson A, 2005.The Trichogramma manual, The texas A& M university system. http://insects.tamu.edu/extension/bulletins/b-6071.html.
Ksentini I, Jardak T and Zeghal N, 2010. Bacillus thuringiensis, deltamethrin and spinosad side-effects on three Trichogramma species,Bulletin of Insectology, 63(1):31-37.
Madhusudhanan E., Krishnamoorthy SV, and Kuttalam S, 2014. Toxicity of Flubendiamide 20 Wg against Egg Parasitoid, Trichogramma chilonis (Ishii). (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) under Laboratory Conditions, Journal of Biological Control. 28(3):409-411.
Mistretta P, and Patrick R D, 2010. Emamectin benzoate Human Health and Ecological Risk Assessment FINAL REPORT.” SESA, USDA Forest Services.
SPSS Inc. 2007. SPSS for Windows, Version 16.0. Chicago, SPSS Inc.
Paiva ACR, Beloti VH and Yamamoto PT, 2018. Sublethal effects of insecticides used in soybean on the parasitoid Trichogramma pretiosum.    Ecotoxicology. 28(4): 448-456. DOI: 10.1007/S10646-018-1909-5.
Parsaeyan E, Safavi SA, Saber M, and Poorjavad N, 2017. Effects of emamectin benzoate and cypermetrin on the demography of Trichogramma brassicae. Crop Protection, 1-6.
Poorjavad N, Goldansaz SH, Dadpour H, and Khajeali J, 2014. Effect of essential oil on some biological and behavioral traits of Trichogramma embryophagum and T. evanescens, Biocontrol,   59:403-413.
Pratissoli D and Parra RP, 2001. Selection of strains of Trichogramma pretiosum to control the Tuta absoluta, Neotropical Entomology, 30(2): 277-282.
Rezende DT, Carvalho GA, Moura AP, Moscardini, VF, Souza JR and Lasmar O, 2005. Side effects of some pesticides used in maize crops in Brazil to the egg parasitoid Trichogramma atopovirilia (Oatman & Platner) (Hym., Trichogrammatidae). Egg Parasitoid News, IOBC. 17.
Ruberson JR, Nemoto H, and Hirose, Y. 1998. Pesticides and Conservation of Natural Enemies in Pest Management. In: Barbosa P. (ed.) Conservation Biological Control. Academic Press, San Diego, CA,  p 207-220.
Sattar Sh, Saljoqi AR, Arif M, Sattar H and Qazi JI, 2011.Toxicity of some new insecticides against Trichogramma chilonis under laboratory and extended laboratory condition , Pakistan Journal Zoology, vol,43(6),1117-1125.
Sheng Z.J, Li LM,  Jing W and Shu Q, 2014.Toxicity and safety evaluation of five insecticides on egg parasitoid, Trichogramma evanescens  westwood.Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture,17(4):715-720.
Sheng ZJ,Li LM, Jing W, and Shu Q, 2009.Toxicity of abamectin on different developmental stages of Trichogramma evanescens Westwood and effects on its population dynamics. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(9):4738-4744.
Sidi MB, Islam MdT, Ibrahim Y and Dzolkhifli O, 2013.Effect of azadirachtin and rotenone on Trichogramma papilionis (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae), Journal of Food Agriculture and Environmental 2:1509-1513.
Siqueira HAA, Guedes RNC, Fragoso DB, and Magalhaes LC, 2001. Abamectin resistance and synergism in Brazilian populations of Tuta absoluta (Meyrick) (Lep., Gelechiidae). International Journal of Pest Management. 47:247-251.   
Stark JD and Banks J E, 2003. Population-level effects of pesticides and other toxicants on arthropods. Annual Review of Entomology, 48, 505-519.
Sterk G, Hassan S A, Baillod M, Bakker F, Bigler F, Blümel S and Calis JNM, 1999. Results of the seventh joint pesticide testing program carried out by the IOBC/WPRS-Working Group ‘Pesticides and Beneficial Organisms’. BioControl, 44(1), 99-117.
Vianna UR, Pratisoli D,  Zanuncio JC,  Lima ER,  Brunner J,  Pereira FF, and Serrao JE, 2009. Insecticide toxicity to Trichogramma pretiosum (Hymenoptera: Trichogrammatidae) females and effect on descendant generation. Ecotoxicology, 18: 180–186.
YamadaT, Takashi H, and Hatano R, 1999. A novel insecticide, Acetamiprid, in Nicotinoid Insecticides and the Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor (Yamamoto, I. and Casida, J., eds.), Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 149–176.
Zappala L, Bernardo U,  Biondi A,   Cocco A, Deliperi S, Delrio G,  Giorgini M,  Pedata P, Rapisarda C, Tropea Garzia G, and Siscaro G, 2012. Recruitment of native parasitoids by the exotic pest Tuta absoluta in Southern Italy. Bulletin of Insectology, 65:51-61.
پژوهش های کاربردی در گیاهپزشکی
دوره 9، شماره 1
خرداد 1399
صفحه 45-58

فایل ها

سابقه مقاله

  • تاریخ دریافت: 02 تیر 1399
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 02 تیر 1399

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار